BUSTED: The New York Times Provides Inside Information For The Hillary Campaign

New York Times Provides Inside Information And Shills For The Hillary Campaign

The relationship between Hillary and the New York Times is cozier than you might think.

The news leak of Trump and inappropriate advances toward women, by The New York Times, was no accident and it’s just the tip of the iceberg of this “news” outlet’s contribution to the Clinton campaign. It turns out that they have been working behind the scenes for a very long time to give Hillary an advantage in timing the break of various news stories.

Here’s a FOX story that outlines media support for Clinton. Strap in; it’s just the beginning.

The ongoing WikiLeaks dump of a top Hillary Clinton lieutenant’s emails is shining a light on the cozy and often improper relationship key members of the press had with the Democratic presidential nominee’s campaign.

Advance notice of debate questions, the promise of positive coverage, and even editorial control over stories are among the eyebrow-raising revelations in emails to and from campaign chairman John Podesta.

“We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed,” a January 2015 memo said of former Politico and current New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman.

And it goes on….


New York Times….

And more Maggie Haberman

Infowars published this email about the collusion between Hillary and NYT

“We have has a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed. While we should have a larger conversation in the near future about a broader strategy for reengaging the beat press that covers HRC, for this we think we can achieve our objective and do the most shaping by going to Maggie,” states the email.

Make America Great Again, folks. Do you want someone in the White House that is using/distorting media this way? Government should be transparent. Media should be ensuring that. They won’t be, with another Clinton in the White House.

Others are confirming what we know from previous reports:

Image: Source


To Top