The Democrats and mainstream media are desperately trying to keep the ‘Russia’ narrative alive as it is falling apart, on fire, in their laps.
As they continue their efforts, one important question to ask is: How is there evidence of Russia trying to hack the 2016 presidential election if the DNC refused to hand over their servers to the FBI?
The Hill reported:
Growing concerns about threats to U.S. election systems have put the heat on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its efforts to boost national cybersecurity.
Homeland Security officials testified this week before the Senate Intelligence Committee that they have evidence that Russia targeted election-related systems in 21 states as part of its wider effort to influence the presidential election.
Now, lawmakers concerned about future foreign interference in U.S. elections are pressuring the department to offer more help to states and provide more details about what happened in 2016.
“I’m deeply concerned about the danger posed by future interference in our elections,” Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the vice chairman of the intelligence panel, said Wednesday. “We have elections in 2018, but in my home state of Virginia, we have statewide elections this year. So this needs a sense of urgency.”
Homeland Security, which was involved in preparing January’s unclassified report on Russian election interference, is responsible for sharing cybersecurity threat information and safeguarding the nation’s critical infrastructure.
Prior to this week, officials had said little publicly about the extent of Russia’s targeting of state and local election systems. That changed Wednesday when two officials said evidence suggests Russian actors targeted election-related systems in 21 different states.
So far the only evidence of any alleged Russian hacking would be on the DNC’s servers which they have refused to hand over to the FBI to be investigated.
Are they hiding something on their servers?
Why are they allowed to withhold evidence from the FBI?