White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer laid the smack down on CNN again on Thursday by saying there is more evidence that CNN colluded with the Hillary campaign than there is evidence that Russia colluded with the Trump campaign.
The Blaze reported:
Earlier, CNN reported that Trump associates may indeed have had communications with the Russians during the 2016 elections that led to damaging information about the Hillary Clinton campaign. When asked about it by a reporter in the press pool, Spicer was actually ready for the subject to be brought up.
“So let’s actually look at what CNN reported,” began Spicer. “They reported that anonymous U.S. officials have told them that information indicates that association of the campaign, and suspected operatives coordinated, which they admit is not conclusive of anything which is bordering collusion. The last line of said, ‘The FBI cannot yet prove that collusion took place.’”
“I think there’s more – probably more – evidence that CNN colluded with the Clinton campaign to give her debate questions than the Trump campaign gave any kind of collusion [with the Russians].”
There is absolute proof that CNN colluded with the Hillary campaign when Donna Brazile gave debate questions to Hillary, a fact that she recently admitted to doing after denying the allegation for months.
Once again, the Trump administration is right!
Follow Ryan Saavedra on Twitter: @