Every time there is a terror attack from an Islamic radical, liberals in media play dumb about the killer’s motive. The recent bombing in Manchester is no different. The New York Times has no idea what motivated the terrorist.
News Busters reports:
New York Times Can’t Figure Out ‘What Led Salman Abedi to Bomb the Manchester Arena’
In an attempt to build up its already “we’ll never really know why they did it” file relating to Islamist radicals taking innocent lives, three reporters at The New York Times composed a 1,900-word report Saturday evening (for Sunday’s print edition) about Manchester bomber Salman Abedi’s family background.
The reporters provided very little hard information about Abedi’s motivations, despite the fact that readers who saw the paper’s tweet (HT Twitchy) which promoted the article were led to expect it: “What led Salman Abedi to bomb the Manchester arena?”
Check out this tweet from the New York Times and note the headline:
What led Salman Abedi to bomb the Manchester arena? https://t.co/hRQEDB76Bp
— The New York Times (@nytimes) May 28, 2017
Here are some responses via Twitchy:
It's a mystery that may never be solved. https://t.co/FdbWQvN2xi
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) May 28, 2017
Trending: At World Economic Forum, John Kerry Says Fighting Climate Change Is All About Money Money Money (VIDEO)
@nytimes Well, see…there's this Arab dude who lived centuries ago named Mohammed…
— HarryGato (@harrygato) May 28, 2017
@nytimes This. pic.twitter.com/tSXDHAeYZK
— ☤ Doc ☤ (@Doc_68W_) May 28, 2017
@nytimes If the New York Times doesn't know the answer to this simple question by now, then it can't be trusted on anything else…
— Amber (@NYCdeb8tr) May 28, 2017
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.