Even The Liberal Media Is Starting To Call Out Rachel Maddow For Dishonesty Over Russia

The liberal media is very quick to label people as conspiracy theorists.

Yet somehow, Rachel Maddow has been allowed to thrive over the last few years. Is there a bigger conspiracy theorist on TV?

Things might be changing, however.

Even liberal outlets are starting to criticize her.

This is from Slate earlier this year:

Rachel Maddow’s Conspiracy Brain

POLL: Should Hunter Biden Be Investigated?

Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Brief updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime with a single click. Here's the Privacy Policy.

On Monday night, the first night that MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Show aired after Attorney General William Barr released his four-page memo on the Mueller report, Rachel Maddow was skeptical. Like, extremely, extremely skeptical. In fact, she had 15 questions worth of skepticism about the “the Barr Report,” which she displayed in remarkably tiny font behind her head.

The questions started with the basics—Had Robert Mueller expected the attorney general to jump in and make a no prosecution, no collusion announcement? Was it appropriate for the attorney general to make that kind of determination at this point in the process?—before taking sudden swerves into the conspiratorial. Robert Mueller had chosen not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment in his report.

“Well,” Maddow wondered, “why did Mueller make that determination and was it, in fact, a choice?” Was it possible that the special prosecutor had not explicitly described the president’s behavior as a crime in his report because there were plans to indict him as soon as he left office?

And this is a new piece from the Washington Post:

Rachel Maddow rooted for the Steele dossier to be true. Then it fell apart.

The case against Maddow is far stronger. When small bits of news arose in favor of the dossier, the franchise MSNBC host pumped air into them. At least some of her many fans surely came away from her broadcasts thinking the dossier was a serious piece of investigative research, not the flimflam, quick-twitch game of telephone outlined in the Horowitz report. She seemed to be rooting for the document.

And when large bits of news arose against the dossier, Maddow found other topics more compelling.

She was there for the bunkings, absent for the debunkings — a pattern of misleading and dishonest asymmetry.

Maddow’s credibility is gone.

It died with the Russia hoax.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.