Report: Debbie Wasserman Schultz Planned To PAY IT Staffer While He WAS LIVING IN PAKISTAN

Reports are that former DNC Chair and current Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (R-FL) is an “absolute wreck” over the Awan fiasco.

As we reported previously:

BUSTED: FBI Seized Smashed Hard Drives From Wasserman Schultz IT Aide’s Home

Awan Brothers Allegedly Helped Rig Dem Primary For Hillary Clinton

RNC Chair Calls On Debbie Wasserman Schultz To Testify Before Congress About IT Staffer

Now, it’s much worse.

POLL: Do You Think Trump Was The Real Winner Of The Election?

Completing this poll entitles you to ProTrumpNews updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime with a single click. Here's the Privacy Policy.

A new report says Debbie intended to pay Awan with tax dollars–had he been successful in fleeing the country–while he was living in Pakistan.

The Daily Caller reports:

Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz seemingly planned to pay cyber-probe suspect and IT aide Imran Awan even while he was living in Pakistan, if the FBI hadn’t stopped him from leaving the U.S. Monday. Public statements and congressional payroll records suggest she also appears to have known that his wife, a fellow IT staffer, left the country for good months ago — while she was also a criminal suspect.

Trending: Michael Bloomberg Event With Judge Judy Draws Pitiful Crowd Of 45 People

In all, six months of actions reveal a decision to continue paying a man who seemingly could not have been providing services to her, and who a mountain of evidence suggests was a liability. The man long had access to all of Wasserman Schultz’s computer files, work emails and personal emails, and he was recently accused by a relative in court documents of wiretapping and extortion.

Records also raise questions about whether the Florida Democrat permitted Awan to continue to access computers after House-wide authorities banned him from the network Feb. 2. Not only did she keep him on staff after the ban, but she also did not have any other IT person to perform necessary work that presumably would have arisen during a months-long period, according to payroll records.

It has to be asked:  What was she paying them for exactly?


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.