In his first interview since Hillary’s White House run loss, John Podesta steps out of the shadows to talk to mainstream media lackey, Chuck Todd about why the Democrats lost to Trump. And guess what! It’s not because Hillary was a bad candidate, of course.
And the way he talks, you would think there was concrete proof, instead of just speculation and mainstream media hyperbole, that the Russians were involved.
PODESTA: I think the Russians clearly intervened in the election. I think that now we know what CIA, the director of National Intelligence, the FBI, all agree that the Russians intervened to help Trump. And that as they noted this week. NBC first revealed that Vladimir Putin was personally involved with that. … I think it was distorted by the Russian intervention.
Watch the video below:
Just as a side note here, no one seems to be reporting that President Obama tried to interfere with Israeli elections. The Hill posted this in March of 2015.
“What was not well reported in the American media is that President Obama and his allies were playing in the election to defeat Prime Minister Netanyahu,” John McLaughlin, a Republican strategist, said in an interview on John Catsimatidis’s “The Cats Roundtable” radio show broadcast Sunday on AM 970 in New York.
“There was money moving that included taxpayer U.S. dollars, through non-profit organizations. And there were various liberal groups in the United States that were raising millions to fund a campaign called V15 against Prime Minister Netanyahu,” McLaughlin said.
So, while the media focuses on unproven accusations that Russia hacked the DNC, perhaps the more pertinent question to be asked why isn’t anyone talking about the content of the Pedesta emails?
Chuck Todd is more intent on proliferating an unproven and false narrative that keeps eyes focused on anything other than Podesta and the content of the DNC emails.